I love endings! That usually means a completion of a task or a goal, and the opportunity to move on to new things. Year endings are the best. Close out the old and start with a clean slate. I think this year will not end so well. Instead of starting fresh we will be dragging an incredible amount of baggage along with us into 2012. As we have moved into our new digital age in the first decade of the 21st century, our legacy tools and traditions, and so much of what makes up our business way of life are struggling to advance with incredible pressure being on them to adapt, or die.
One of our oldest tools in the U.S. has been the Postal Service initiated in large part by Benjamin Franklin. It was instrumental to our overall success for over 200 hundred years. Today, it is seen by many as a ‘relic’ of the past as new digital tools have eaten into its core ability to facilitate communication. Hand written letters are becoming things of the past. Our current generation would not understand the context of the old saw – “keep those cards and letters coming!” Now we have to warn people about communicating (i.e. – texting) while driving.
I could go on for days about this transition, but I won’t. I have written extensively about the battle for the future of our USPS and what it means to commerce and personal communication. The leaders of the USPS have offered solutions – i.e cutbacks, and I have applauded their honesty and candor about their situation and things that must be done to keep the USPS on a sound financial footing given our change in mailing patterns.
The latest salvo against their plan has come from their masters, the Postal Commission – “Postal Service’s Closure Review Process Was Flawed, Panel Says” They believe that the original plan was ‘flawed’ and did not take into consideration a number of sensitive issues other than just cost. That is an honest statement, but the overall consideration by the Commission is politics. The only answer for the USPS is a full and open consideration of what we expect from the service in light of today’s evolving digital world, and what are we will to pay for as citizens to preserve the service as a whole, and how will the prime users contribute to save their unique positions. This includes the full commercial mailers, and rural users who are the prime drivers of cost.
I await 2012 to see how this evolves. I expect no real answers until after the election of 2012 which will go a long way to determining how we as a large community will choose to deploy and pay for the resources that we use.

