Is this in our future?
I was amused to read the article in the recent Los Angeles Times–” Coastal cities will sponsors: make our beach your sandwich board”. Boy did that bring back memories for me. For several years, beginning in 1999, I led a start-up in Southern California that offered advertising on local government vehicles. This was a fun venture for several years, but then the fun for me left of the business. It appears from the comments in the articles that little have changed since that time. Local governments are still looking for new revenue sources, but are not willing to give enough value to attract advertisers who have more attractive ways to reach their audiences.
Beginning in the late 90s, and continuing through the early years, municipal corporate advertising was in its heyday. By the mid-“ought” years the bloom had come off the rose. The hard fought battle to gain acceptance have led to some significant revenue streams. However, it was then that the impact began to be felt from the growing Internet advertising. We could see that the trend would gobble up much of the hard fought growth that had been expensive to win.
The real trend in municipal advertising has come from larger sponsorships mostly to stadium advertising. This is where the big bucks are. A few dollars have been left over from corporate budgets that have leaked into municipal advertising programs. My experience in the early years of municipal advertising showed me that the concept was viable, and rewarding, but in the long term most programs would not be sustainable. Why? The reality that I found, and others in the same field found, was that the returns for advertisers was not at the level of their expectations. High client churn, meant high sales costs. Within a short period of time, usually within 2 years, the programs started to decline.
Advertising and government places can work, however the price generally doesn’t match the value received and the grief rendered. My experience, and those of other compatriots working in the field at that time, showed that working with the government agencies was costly, time-consuming, and unfulfilling. The dollars earned simply did not match the effort and as such made the venture non-sustainable. This can work for both sides, if and when, the value ratio can meet expectations of both sides
I am 
